I was a good student. I listened and raised my
hand. I got good grades and handed in my assignments on time.
I was always engaged.
But I was also the person in class who diverted
the discussion. I was the tangent-maker.
I would pay such attention to the lesson that I would curiously inquire But is
that always the case? Which would inevitably lead to some other teacher-ly thoughts
outside of the lesson plan.
This need to go off course is a mutant form of
ADD: Attention Divergence Disorder.
It means: habitual meandering from the topic.
It means: my interests lie outside of the box.
In Robert Frost terms it means inquisitively investigating
the road less traveled by.
And this is what I was thinking about at the US Open
Qualifiers the other day—how I could never be the person sitting in the chair
keeping the score. I would find too many other things beckoning me from the job
at hand. I could not simply count point after point and enter them into the
computer. I would think Why is that
player continuing to make drop shots when it is clear from the 20 failed
attempts that that isn’t a good play? I would look around at the crowd and
wonder Is that guy the coach or just a
really dedicated fan? I would wonder why a stance was so peculiar or what
the player was saying in their native tongue.
All that divergent thinking would impede my
record keeping. Too many of my thoughts would lie outside of my demands.
Because tangent-makers do not make good
scorekeepers. A scorekeeper’s role is to count without investment---to remain
in a vacuum—to have Attention Revert-gence
Disorder. They must remain on the road well traveled by. Because the only points that count in tennis are the ones that fall inside and not outside of the "box".
No comments:
Post a Comment