Last year, right next to the Congressional golf
course in Maryland where the US Open for golf was being held, 2 little girls opened a
lemonade stand. They planned on donating all their profits to charity—pediatric
cancer research. But the police came and shut them down. The girls were fined $500 for operating
without a permit.
The Winter Wonderland is a semi-formal dance held
every year in December at the high school. There are always concerns about the
safety of the attendees and so PTA and the school district work cooperatively
to diseminate guidelines in order to derail issues and prevent problems.
Information is sent home as well as posted on the districts and PTA’s website.
And one year one of my daughters was invited to the
dance and so as an attentive parent I chose to follow the published guidelines.
I planned to call the mother of the boy to express my expectations and to
exchange appropriate cell phone numbers. I planned on sharing my concerns and
establishing a curfew. And the good news was I was acquainted with both the
mother and the boy and knew them to be well regarded. But when I pulled out my
phone book and all the class lists and sports rosters I had collected over the
years, I realized that the boy’s phone number that I had found on a nursery school
class list, was no longer in service— the current number was unlisted.
So with little concern I emailed a PTA contact who I
knew had access to the information I needed. I explained to the contact person that
I needed the boy’s home number for safety reasons. And I specifically contacted
this PTA woman because not only did I know that she had access to the listing,
but because I also wanted her to know that I was following established PTA guidelines. I
had a bit of an agenda to demonstrate what a good parent I was.
But shockingly the PTA contact person emailed me back
refusing me the information I needed. While she understood my desire to keep my
daughter safe, she explained that giving out the number was a breech of PTA’s rules--and she did not wish to break the
rules.
So I said thank you and immediately appealed to a
higher PTA authority that could see the greater good of the situation. She
promptly gave me the unlisted phone number. This woman did not even think twice
about breeching confidentiality. She understood the concept safety first.
And when the two little girls and their parents
appealed to a higher authority—the town’s Permit officer-- she waved the
citation. And the girls were allowed to operate their charitible enterprise once
again-- albeit recessed a few feet back from the corner. Because while the little girls
were in violation of a rarely enforced law, the higher authority saw the
greater good of the situation: charity
first.
And the PTA contact who ridgidly held to the organization’s
rules continued to do. And the PTA higher authority who could see the greater
good continued to chose children over organizational regulations. And in the
end it was all good. Everyone got what they wanted.
No comments:
Post a Comment