One day when I was working at the lab my manager called me into his office. In his hand was the pile of lab reports from the day before. My immediate boss was on vacation and I was charged with getting the reports out in her absence. And my manager, Jerry, told me that he had just come from Dolly’s office (the director of the lab who did not like me.) And he said that she (Dolly) was unhappy with my signature. Dolly did not like the way it trailed off at the end. And she was concerned that if the lab reports ever went to court that my signature would not be legal.
And I thought about it for a minute and told Jerry She wants me to change my signature? And he said Yes. And I said but Jerry if I change my signature it wouldn’t be my signature anymore would it?—it would be a forgery –and forgery is illegal—and then it really wouldn’t hold up in court? Right?
When I became PTA director of Locust School part of my duties was to write a monthly article for the PTA newsletter. The article was a recap of classroom events. Locust school was a primary school--kindergarten and first grade only. There was never much to report and so the article was never more than a few paragraphs long.
The PTA newsletter had an editor. The editor was a bright and lovely woman. And editing had been her profession prior to having children. And every month I would submit my little article, and every month I would rush to see what I had written in print. And every month what appeared in print didn’t look anything like what I had submitted. Now I will be the first to confess that I am an amateur writer. I am absolutely certain that at times my grammar and punctuation is incorrect. I was not an English major in college. I am happy to admit to technical writing errors.
But grammar and punctuation was not what was corrected in my articles. Entire paragraphs were rewritten in words that were not my own. And the sentence structure and style wasn’t anything even remotely close to what I had intended. I would write sentences like Several weeks of civics study for the first graders culminated in a trip to the Nassau County Courthouse appeared in the newsletter as something like The first graders went on a class trip to the Nassau County Courthouse. They have been studying what it means to be a good citizen for the last several weeks. The trip marked the endpoint of their study (that is an illustration—I do not remember exact text).
And by the December newsletter I was a bit annoyed. It appeared that all the other PTA directors, after I had questioned them, did not share my editing experience—whatever they had written appeared nearly verbatim in the newsletter. And so I asked the editor why she kept rewriting my articles. And she told me that my writing was too concise. My words were too big. And that my writing wasn’t readable for the average mom. And then she told me (very nicely) that I should think about my audience when I wrote, and write more simply.
I said nothing. What was I to say to that? I was not an editor—I had no expertise. But I was a bit insulted—not about the concise, big word part—I have heard that all my life—it’s usually what my teachers praised. No. I was perturbed about the idea that moms were simpletons. Every mom I knew had a college education and was some sort of professional. I resented the implication that these moms wouldn’t find my writing readable—you know—as if my writing was equal to that of Tolstoy.
So I kept writing in my own concise style, with my so-called big words, and so-called not-so-readable text. And until the editor’s tenure was up she continued every month to dissect and recreate my work until it was not recognizable as mine.
And I did not change my signature to appease Dolly either. Your signature is your signature—that’s the point—it is uniquely yours--by definition. One must always be authentic—true to oneself. Unless of course you are a chameleon. Only chameleons should morph their colors to match their environment--- because that is who they are by nature—and that is who I am not.