In the front of the room, long tables were situated
to face the audience. Seated were the administrators, the attorney, as well as
the five Board of Education members.
The crowd of residents, parents and students
practiced their impassioned thoughts silently to themselves in preparation for
their turn to speak.
An undercurrent of contention pulsed well before any
words were spoken.
On a winter's night in 2009 people left their dinner
tables to implore the Board of Education to either keep graduation on Sunday or
to move it to Saturday morning. And when
the allotted time for public comment had ended, the president of the BOE called
a vote: the president and one other member voted to move graduation to Saturday
morning, but the 3 remaining members voted to keep graduation on Sunday for one
more year.
The crowd cheered in hearing the 3-2 vote in favor of
keeping the traditional Sunday date.
And that is when the President of the Board of Education
called a brief recess.
The crowd hollered that private discussions were in
violation of open meetings law (OML).
But the five members left the room and conversed in
private anyway. The attorney for the district remained silent.
And when the 15 minute conclave was over, the
president called for a re-vote. But
this time all five members unanimously voted in favor of moving graduation to Saturday. After that private discussion
three of the five BOE members completely reversed their vote and sided with the
BOE president.
The audience protested--- but it did not matter. The president
said so moved.
And two months ago a friend who had been in the room
with me that February night four years ago said What do you make of the unanimous
decision the Board of Education made to extend the Superintendent’s contract
along with giving him a hefty salary increase-- particularly in face of
budgetary constraints and cuts?
And I said based on personal experience and what I had
witnessed in the past with this regime, I could not help but wonder whether the
BOE’s decision on the superintendent’s contract was unanimously unanimous or made
to be unanimously unanimous behind
closed doors.
It is something I will never know for sure.
Because fool me once shame on you, but fool me twice---
well that’s an entirely different blog post altogether.
No comments:
Post a Comment